State v. Dale

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. David Dale Sheriff, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-453 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-453

07-18-2012

The State, Respondent, v. David Dale Sheriff, Appellant.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and David Dale Sheriff, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted May 1, 2012

Appeal From Anderson County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and David Dale Sheriff, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

David Dale Sheriff appeals his conviction of first-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in not allowing the State's notice of intent to seek a sentence of life without parole into evidence. Additionally, Sheriff filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C. J, and HUFF and SHORT, JJ, concur