State v. Cunningham

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. James Clifford Cunningham, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-444 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-444

10-11-2011

The State, Respondent, v. James Clifford Cunningham, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : James Clifford Cunningham appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking probation because the incident for which he was placed on probation occurred nearly ten years prior. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.