State v. Cummings

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Tristian Cummings, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Appellate Case No. 2019-000665 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-266 Appellate Case 2019-000665

07-14-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Tristian Cummings, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Tristian Cummings, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted June 1, 2021

Appeal From Greenville County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Tristian Cummings, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.