From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1889
10 S.E. 468 (N.C. 1889)

Opinion

(September Term, 1889.)

Special Verdict — New Trial.

If a special verdict fails to find all the facts essential to a decision of the case, it is fatally defective and a new trial must be awarded.

CRIMINAL ACTION, which was tried at May Term, 1889, of GUILFORD, before Bynum, J., upon appeal from a justice of the peace.

Attorney-General for the State.

No counsel for defendant.


Upon a special verdict returned by the jury, the court adjudged the defendant not guilty, from which the State appealed.


The defendant was charged with peddling without a license, as required by law. There was a special verdict, and this does not find whether or not the defendant had such license. Nor does it find that he was required to exhibit one by the proper authorities and failed to do so; in which case there would have been a (764) presumption that he had none. Section 24, chapter 216, Laws 1889.

The verdict being thus fatally defective, there must be a new trial. S. v. Oakley, 103 N.C. 409; S. v. Bray, 89 N.C. 480.

Error.

Cited: S. v. Corporation, 111 N.C. 664; S. v. Hanner, 143 N.C. 635.


Summaries of

State v. Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1889
10 S.E. 468 (N.C. 1889)
Case details for

State v. Crump

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. JOHN P. CRUMP

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1889

Citations

10 S.E. 468 (N.C. 1889)
104 N.C. 763

Citing Cases

State v. Hanner

Therefore, in finding a special verdict the facts should be stated fully and explicitly, (635) and the…

State v. Corporation

This finding being irreconcilable with the principle that in felling the tree and allowing it to remain five…