From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1935
209 N.C. 52 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 11 December, 1935.)

APPEAL by defendant from Williams, J., at April Term, 1935, of WAKE.

Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the State.

Wilbur H. Royster for defendant.


Criminal prosecution, tried upon indictment charging the defendant with violations of the prohibition laws.

The defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty under chapter 23, Public Laws 1933, and waived trial by jury.

The court found the defendant guilty upon the evidence offered, and sentenced him to eight months on the roads.

Defendant appeals, assigning error.


As the proceeding in the Superior Court is without warrant of constitutional law, the judgment will be stricken out and the cause remanded for trial by jury as the law provides. None has yet been had. S. v. Camby, ante, 50.

Error and remanded.

DEVIN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

State v. Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1935
209 N.C. 52 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

State v. Crump

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. JAMES CRUMP

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1935

Citations

209 N.C. 52 (N.C. 1935)
182 S.E. 716

Citing Cases

State v. Tate

No error. Cited: S. v. Merrick, 172 N.C. 872; S. v. Boyd, 175 N.C. 792; S. v. Pulliam, 184 N.C. 684; S. v.…

State v. Stevens

Ordinarily, when evidence is introduced by the State after a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere, it is…