From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crosby

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 6, 2016
793 S.E.2d 291 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

distinguishing the facts from Laney on the grounds the State's evidence tended to show "at least three separate and distinct indecent liberties taken by defendant, separated by gaps of time"

Summary of this case from State v. Calderon
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. COA16–172

12-06-2016

STATE of North Carolina v. David Obadiah CROSBY

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Anita LeVeaux, for the State. Parish & Cooke, Fayettville, by James R. Parish, for defendant-appellant.

CALABRIA, Judge.

NO ERROR.

Summaries of

State v. Crosby

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 6, 2016
793 S.E.2d 291 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

distinguishing the facts from Laney on the grounds the State's evidence tended to show "at least three separate and distinct indecent liberties taken by defendant, separated by gaps of time"

Summary of this case from State v. Calderon
Case details for

State v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID OBADIAH CROSBY

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Dec 6, 2016

Citations

793 S.E.2d 291 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Calderon

SeeLaney , 178 N.C. App. at 341, 631 S.E.2d at 525 (concluding "there was no gap in time between two…

1 Citing Cases