From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cornish

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 14, 2020
2020-UP-287 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-287

10-14-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Larry Cornish, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001866

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Larry Cornish, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2020

Appeal From Fairfield County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Larry Cornish, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Cornish

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 14, 2020
2020-UP-287 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Cornish

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Larry Cornish, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

2020-UP-287 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2020)