State v. Cornish

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Larry Cornish, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2017-001866 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-001866 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-287

10-14-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Larry Cornish, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Larry Cornish, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Fairfield County
Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Larry Cornish, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.