From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 25, 1993
619 So. 2d 1060 (La. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-K-0982.

June 25, 1993.

Applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 92-KA-0904; Parish of Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Div. "H", No. 91-256.


The defendant sentence of 2 1/2 years at hard labor for intentionally communicating false information relative to a circumstance dangerous to human life in violation of La.R.S. 14:40.1 is apparently severe for a youthful first offender with a long history of schizophrenia. The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1 nor does it reflect that the trial court provided a factual basis for choice of punishment. The defendant's sentence is accordingly vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

On remand the district court should comply with Art. 894.1 as amended by Act 1991, No. 22, § 1, effective January 31, 1992, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate punishment to be imposed. See, State v. Sabathe, 617 So.2d 1176 (La. 1993); State v. Blue, 591 So.2d 1173 (La. 1992).

In all other respects, the application is denied.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.


Summaries of

State v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 25, 1993
619 So. 2d 1060 (La. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GORDON CONRAD

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 25, 1993

Citations

619 So. 2d 1060 (La. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Lebouef

The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with Art. 894.1 nor does it reflect that…

State v. Hill

[Emphasis supplied]. See also State v. Conrad, 619 So.2d 1060 (La. 1993). In State v. Smith, 610 So.2d 152…