State v. Conder

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Steve W. Conder, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-110 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-110

02-22-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Steve W. Conder, Appellant.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Steve W. Conder appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court's full revocation was unduly excessive. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, J.J., concur.