From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Combs

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 12, 2007
361 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2007)

Summary

explaining that constructive presence for the purposes of finding defendant guilty of a crime under a theory of acting in concert "is not determined by the defendant’s actual distance from the crime; the accused simply must be near enough to render assistance if need be and to encourage the actual perpetration of the crime"

Summary of this case from State v. Kelly

Opinion

No. 219A07.

October 12, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 182 N.C. App.___, 642 S.E.2d 491 (2007), finding no prejudicial error in a judgment entered 7 December 2005 by Judge John O. Craig III in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2007.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amanda P. Little, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. James N. Freeman, Jr. for defendant-appellant.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Combs

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 12, 2007
361 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2007)

explaining that constructive presence for the purposes of finding defendant guilty of a crime under a theory of acting in concert "is not determined by the defendant’s actual distance from the crime; the accused simply must be near enough to render assistance if need be and to encourage the actual perpetration of the crime"

Summary of this case from State v. Kelly
Case details for

State v. Combs

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANGELIA SCATES COMBS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 12, 2007

Citations

361 N.C. 585 (N.C. 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Sawyer

State v. Combs, 182 N.C.App. 365, 370, 642 S.E.2d 491, 496 (citation omitted), aff'd per curiam, 361 N.C.…

State v. McNeill

This Court has held that the driver of a getaway car in an armed robbery “may be constructively present at…