From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Coleman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 29, 1995
905 S.W.2d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 65770, 67602.

August 29, 1995.

APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, FRANKLIN COUNTY; JEFFREY W. SCHAEPERKOETTER, JUDGE.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for State.

Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for Askia Coleman.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals the judgment entered after his conviction by jury of delivery of a controlled substance. Defendant argues the trial court erred by overruling his motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. We have reviewed the briefs, legal file and transcript and find the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Defendant also appeals the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion because it was not timely filed. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25 (b) and 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

State v. Coleman

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 29, 1995
905 S.W.2d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. ASKIA COLEMAN, APPELLANT. ASKIA J…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Aug 29, 1995

Citations

905 S.W.2d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)