From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cockerham

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 15, 2018
245 So. 3d 1035 (La. 2018)

Summary

rejecting defendant’s theory of misidentification where victim saw the defendant "pretty good" outside in the dark on night of incident and identified defendant shortly after the incident and again at trial

Summary of this case from State v. Jackson

Opinion

No. 2017–KO–1802

06-15-2018

STATE of Louisiana v. Kelly B. COCKERHAM


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF WEST BATON ROUGE

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons:As Judge Holdridge notes in his dissent below, without an amendment to the habitual offender bill of information by the district attorney, the district court was limited to sentencing the defendant as a third-felony offender. I agree and would therefore reverse the fourth-felony adjudication and remand to the district court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

State v. Cockerham

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 15, 2018
245 So. 3d 1035 (La. 2018)

rejecting defendant’s theory of misidentification where victim saw the defendant "pretty good" outside in the dark on night of incident and identified defendant shortly after the incident and again at trial

Summary of this case from State v. Jackson
Case details for

State v. Cockerham

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KELLY B. COCKERHAM

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 15, 2018

Citations

245 So. 3d 1035 (La. 2018)

Citing Cases

State v. Young

Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See also La. Code Crim.…

State v. Williams

An appellate court is constitutionally precluded from acting as a "thirteenth juror" in assessing what weight…