State v. Cochran

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Charles Wayne Cochran, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Appellate Case No. 2010-162208 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-162208 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-419

07-11-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Charles Wayne Cochran, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Charles Wayne Cochran appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation based partially on his failure to complete a condition of his probation that was not specifically ordered during sentencing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.