From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clevenger

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 25, 1983
667 P.2d 9 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

81-2006, 81-2389; CA A23835, CA A23836

Argued and submitted July 22, 1982

Appeal dismissed August 3, 1982 Reconsideration denied September 16, 1982 Petition for review allowed October 25, 1983 ( 295 Or. 840) See 297 Or. 234, 683 P.2d 1360 (1984)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County.

Richard L. Barron, Judge.

Ronald K. Cox, Assistant Public Defender, Coquille, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Daryl Dodson Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.


Defendant appeals his convictions of theft in the first degree and assault in the second degree, following pleas entered as part of a plea bargain that resulted in the dismissal of several other charges. He assigns error to the trial court's denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to the assault charge and his plea of guilty to the theft charge, contending that the factual basis for the no contest plea ceased to exist as of the time of sentencing and that the guilty plea was rendered involuntary because of certain misrepresentations made by a police officer.

This court is not authorized to consider on direct appeal defendant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his pleas. ORS 138.050; State v. Lugo, 48 Or. App. 919, 618 P.2d 986 (1980); State v. Slopak, 3 Or. App. 532, 475 P.2d 421 (1970). Only matters relating to the sentence may be considered unless, as a matter of law, there has been no valid guilty plea under ORS 135.380(2) and, therefore, no conviction. State v. Reichert, 39 Or. App. 905, 593 P.2d 1298 (1979). If defendant has a remedy, it is under the Post Conviction Act.

ORS 135.380(2) provides:

"A defendant with counsel may plead guilty or no contest on the day of arraignment or any time thereafter. A defendant without counsel shall not be allowed to plead guilty or no contest to a felony on the day of arraignment."

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Clevenger

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 25, 1983
667 P.2d 9 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Clevenger

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRUCE NEIL CLEVENGER, Appellant. (Cases…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 25, 1983

Citations

667 P.2d 9 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
667 P.2d 9

Citing Cases

State v. Elwood

He assigns error to the trial court's subsequent refusal to permit him to withdraw his guilty pleas. This…

State v. Elwood

Defendant responded that this court in State v. Cornelius, 249 Or. 454, 438 P.2d 1020 (1968), and State v.…