From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clarkson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 450 (S.C. 2001)

Opinion

Opinion No. 25365.

Submitted September 18, 2001.

Filed October 1, 2001.

Appeal From York County, Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge.

REVERSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for respondent.

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for petitioner.


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS


Respondent was indicted for assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct against a minor in the second degree (ACSC) and pled guilty to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). The Court of Appeals vacated his guilty plea. State v. Clarkson, 337 S.C. 518, 523 S.E.2d 817 (Ct.App. 1999). The State has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Court of Appeals' opinion. We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, dispense with further briefing and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Relying on its opinion in State v. Elliott, 335 S.C. 512, 517 S.E.2d 713 (Ct.App. 1999), the Court of Appeals determined respondent's guilty plea should be vacated because ABHAN is not a lesser-included offense of ACSC. This Court recently reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals in Elliott and held that ABHAN is a lesser-included offense of ACSC.State v. Elliott, Op. No. 25356 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed September 4, 2001) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 32 at 55). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in vacating respondent's guilty plea.

REVERSED.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Clarkson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 1, 2001
553 S.E.2d 450 (S.C. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Clarkson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Petitioner, v. Edward M. Clarkson, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

553 S.E.2d 450 (S.C. 2001)
553 S.E.2d 450

Citing Cases

Odom v. State

Similarly, S.C. Code Ann. § 17-23-140 (1985) provides that "upon signing the waiver of presentment" the…