From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 19, 2020
2020-UP-050 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-050

02-19-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Randall Scott Clark, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000829

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2020

Appeal From Oconee County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 19, 2020
2020-UP-050 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Randall Scott Clark, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

2020-UP-050 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)