Opinion
No. 20-KH-0197
09-29-2020
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANDERSON CLARK
IN RE: Anderson Clark - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of Orleans Criminal, Criminal District Court Number(s) 358-792, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number(s) 2019-K-1042; Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JHB
BJJ
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
Supreme Court of Louisiana
September 29, 2020 /s/_________
Clerk of Court
For the Court ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS PER CURIAM:
Retired Judge James Boddie, Jr., appointed Justice pro tempore, sitting for the vacancy in Louisiana Supreme Court District 4. --------
Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.