From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cirasole

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1940
30 N.E.2d 997 (Ohio 1940)

Opinion

No. 28382

Decided December 24, 1940.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Killing while in perpetration of robbery — Defendants ordered tried jointly prior to appointment of counsel — Motions by defendants' counsel for separate trials overruled — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Charge of court — Misconduct of counsel — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Neil W. McGill and Mr. John P. Butler, for appellee.

Mr. Edward C. Stanton and Mr. James P. Mooney, for appellants.


It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Cirasole

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 24, 1940
30 N.E.2d 997 (Ohio 1940)
Case details for

State v. Cirasole

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. CIRASOLE ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 24, 1940

Citations

30 N.E.2d 997 (Ohio 1940)
30 N.E.2d 997