From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Chisolm

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 6, 2019
2019-UP-352 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-352

11-06-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Naijuwuan S. Chisolm, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000544

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2019

Appeal From Jasper County Perry M. Buckner, III, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Chisolm

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 6, 2019
2019-UP-352 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Chisolm

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Naijuwuan S. Chisolm, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 6, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-352 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 6, 2019)