From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Charles Investment Corp.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 21, 1977
151 N.J. Super. 14 (App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1977 —

Decided June 21, 1977.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and PRESSLER.

Mr. Harold A. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys; Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan on the brief).

Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).


The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bilder.

Despite the suggestion of the condemnee, the specific circumstances of this case satisfy us that Washington Market Enterprises v. Trenton, 68 N.J. 107 (1975). has no application.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Charles Investment Corp.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 21, 1977
151 N.J. Super. 14 (App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Charles Investment Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 21, 1977

Citations

151 N.J. Super. 14 (App. Div. 1977)
376 A.2d 534

Citing Cases

Lima Sons, Inc. v. Borough of Ramsey

The pronouncement in Antonelli must be read in conjunction with High Horizons Dev. Co., supra. See also…

State v. Inhabitants of Phillipsburg

The State points out that "[a property owner is not] entitled to compensation because of inconveniences…