From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Chappell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 27, 2024
No. 2024-UP-104 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-104 Appellate Case 2022-000446

03-27-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Frederick Robert Chappell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2024

Appeal From Greenville County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Chappell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 27, 2024
No. 2024-UP-104 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Chappell

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Frederick Robert Chappell, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-104 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)