From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Sep 28, 2007
2007 Ohio 5314 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. L-07-1012.

Decided: September 28, 2007.

Trial Court No. CR-2005-2112.

Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and David F. Cooper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Karl R. Rissland, for appellant.


DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY


{¶ 1} Appellant, Rondle Carroll, appeals the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his motion for postconviction relief. A jury convicted him of four counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, violations of R.C. 2907.04(A) and (B)(3) and felonies of the third degree, and three counts of rape committed against a person under 13 years of age, violations of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and felonies of the first degree. He was sentenced to a total term of 23 years incarceration.

{¶ 2} Appellant also timely filed a direct appeal of his conviction. Our decision in the direct appeal, State v. Carroll, 6th Dist. No. L-05-1362, 2007-Ohio-____, reversed appellant's convictions on the grounds that appellant was denied a fair trial in violation of due process. Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution; Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83; United States v. Bagley (1985), 473 U.S. 667.

{¶ 3} Upon review, we find that appellant's petition for postconviction relief asserts identical grounds to those he asserted in his direct appeal of the trial court's decision denying his motion for a new trial.

{¶ 4} Accordingly, this petition is rendered moot by the disposition of appellant's direct appeal and the instant appeal must be dismissed.

{¶ 5} This appeal is ordered dismissed. Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App.R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Lucas County.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4.

Peter M. Handwork, J., Arlene Singer, J., William J. Skow, J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

State v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Sep 28, 2007
2007 Ohio 5314 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Appellee v. Rondle Carroll, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County

Date published: Sep 28, 2007

Citations

2007 Ohio 5314 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)