From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2003
356 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2003)

Summary

stating that "[i]t is well settled that this Court will not review constitutional questions that `[were] not raised or passed upon in the trial court'" (quoting State v. Elam, 302 N.C. 157, 160-61, 273 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1981))

Summary of this case from State v. Chiaromonte

Opinion

No. 21P03

Filed 27 February 2003


ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of February 2003.


Summaries of

State v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 2003
356 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2003)

stating that "[i]t is well settled that this Court will not review constitutional questions that `[were] not raised or passed upon in the trial court'" (quoting State v. Elam, 302 N.C. 157, 160-61, 273 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1981))

Summary of this case from State v. Chiaromonte
Case details for

State v. Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:State of North Carolina v. Vincent Todd Carpenter

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 2003

Citations

356 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2003)
577 S.E.2d 897
577 S.E.2d 896

Citing Cases

State v. Hogan

We recognize that there are several cases in which this Court has decided that New Jersey convictions cannot…

State v. Green

¶ 34 "When a panel of this Court has decided the same issue in a different case, subsequent panels are bound…