Opinion
Submitted October 26, 1934 —
Decided January 10, 1935.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 115.
For the defendant in error, Erwin E. Marshall.
For the plaintiff in error, William A. Moore.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.