From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bustamonte

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Apr 20, 1989
542 So. 2d 215 (La. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. K88-1170.

April 20, 1989.

APPEAL FROM FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU, STATE OF LOUISIANA.

Aurelio Bustamonte, Homer, for defendant-relator.

Richard Ieyoub, Dist. Atty., Lake Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before DOUCET, YELVERTON and KNOLL, JJ.


WRIT DENIED: Relator's sentence of 10 years at hard labor and a fine of $150,000.00 with an additional one year imprisonment if he should default in payment of the fine was a part of the plea agreement between the state and the defense. The record in this case reflects that relator had retained counsel during the guilty plea proceedings and that the issue of relator's indigency status, if applicable, was never raised by the defense. It is only now during the post-conviction process that relator claims to be indigent, and thus, argues that the additional one year imprisonment in default of payment of the fine is unconstitutional. Fines are payable immediately upon imposition of sentence. La.C.Cr.P. art. 888. Therefore, relator had an opportunity to pay the fine before any indigency which may have been caused by his subsequent incarceration. Since relator chose not to do this, he cannot claim his indigency status in post-conviction proceedings. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in denying relator's application for post-conviction relief.


Summaries of

State v. Bustamonte

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Apr 20, 1989
542 So. 2d 215 (La. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Bustamonte

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AURELIO BUSTAMONTE…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 215 (La. Ct. App. 1989)