From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Buchanan

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 21, 2018
924 N.W.2d 878 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

holding that "[b]ecause defendants are entitled to access the information necessary to enforce their right to a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, we conclude the district court should have granted [defendant's recess] request and allowed him to investigate the matter"

Summary of this case from State v. Armsted

Opinion

No. 17-1713

11-21-2018

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lundell Earlest BUCHANAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Chad R. Frese of Kaplan & Frese, LLP, Marshalltown, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed on Condition and Remanded With Directions.


Summaries of

State v. Buchanan

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 21, 2018
924 N.W.2d 878 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

holding that "[b]ecause defendants are entitled to access the information necessary to enforce their right to a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, we conclude the district court should have granted [defendant's recess] request and allowed him to investigate the matter"

Summary of this case from State v. Armsted

remanding to address the third prong in Plain

Summary of this case from State v. Armsted
Case details for

State v. Buchanan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUNDELL EARLEST BUCHANAN…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Nov 21, 2018

Citations

924 N.W.2d 878 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

State v. Armsted

Moreover, the State notes that if we find "Armsted[ ] has preserved a substantive constitutional challenge to…

State v. Meredith

. Similarly, in State v. Buchanan, the defendant requested a continuance to conduct "discovery on the method…