From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 28, 1927
112 So. 304 (La. 1927)

Opinion

No. 28440.

March 28, 1927.

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; A.D. Henriques, Judge.

A.J. Hollander and L.H. Gosserand, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Henry Mooney, Dist. Atty., and Eugene Stanley, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of New Orleans (E.R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.


Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for having violated Act 41 of 1924, by having in his possession cigarettes containing the dried form of the Mexican plant, known as Marajuana. The record contains neither a bill of exceptions nor an assignment of errors, and no error appears on the face of the record. Under these circumstances, there remains nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence from which the appeal is taken.

The verdict and the sentence appealed from are therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 28, 1927
112 So. 304 (La. 1927)
Case details for

State v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. FRANK BRUNO

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 28, 1927

Citations

112 So. 304 (La. 1927)
112 So. 304