Opinion
No. 2013AP1136–CR.
2014-05-6
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert L. BROWN, Defendant–Appellant.
Brown does not appear to challenge the admissibility of Rennicke's testimony under subsection (3), but does contend Rennicke's opinion was not based on his perception and did not aid the determination of a fact in issue under subsections (1) and (2), respectively.