From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 26, 2009
281 S.W.3d 850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED90944.

March 10, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 16, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Cause No. 0622-CR2088-01, David L. Dowd, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Luke Brown (hereinafter, "Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo (2000) and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole on the murder conviction, and twenty-five years' imprisonment on the armed criminal action conviction, to be served consecutively.

Appellant raises three points on appeal. In his first two points, Appellant argues his constitutional right to remain silent was violated when the jury saw a video-taped recording stopped when Appellant so requested, and when the prosecutor made repeated reference during closing argument that Appellant failed to assert any theory of self-defense when he was interviewed by the police. In Appellant's third point, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his convictions in that he claims the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Appellant deliberated when he killed the victim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal and find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 26, 2009
281 S.W.3d 850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Luke BROWN, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

281 S.W.3d 850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Steele

[ECF No. 9 Ex. B. at 59-62]. Petitioner filed a direct appeal of his conviction with the Missouri Court of…

Brown v. State

Luke Brown (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction…