From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 23, 1954
161 Ohio St. 346 (Ohio 1954)

Opinion

No. 33976

Decided April 23, 1954.

Elections — Primaries — Unexpired term of probate judge — Election not authorized, when — Term less than year following general election — Section 13, Article IV, Constitution.

IN MANDAMUS.

By this proceeding in mandamus, instituted in this court, relator seeks to have her name placed on the ballot, to be voted at the MaY 4, 1954, primary election, as candidate for the office of judge of the Probate Court of Scioto County for the unexpired term ending February 8, 1955.

Respondent's demurrer to the petition, on the ground that the petition does not state facts which show a cause of action, presents the issue whether the Constitution and laws of this state authorize an election to such unexpired term ending February 8, 1955, less than "one year immediately following the date of such general election."

Mr. Edgar H. Hale, for relator.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Robert E. Leach, for respondent.


The provisions of Section 13 of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution are dispositive of this case. That section reads as follows:

"In case the office of any judge shall become vacant, before the expiration of the regular term for which he was elected, the vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the Governor, until a successor is elected and has qualified; and such successor shall be elected for the unexpired term, at the first general election for the office which is vacant that occurs more than forty days after the vacancy shall have occurred; provided, however, that when the unexpired term ends within one year immediately following the date of such general election, an election to fill such unexpired term shall not be held and the appointment shall be for such unexpired term." (Emphasis supplied.)

Such provisions, as amended in 1942, are specific, control in the instant case over general provisions of the Constitution, and were not repealed by implication by the amendment in 1947 of Section 2 of Article XVII of the Constitution. State, ex rel. Hoyt, v. Metcalfe, 80 Ohio St. 244, 88 N.E. 738.

The writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 23, 1954
161 Ohio St. 346 (Ohio 1954)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. DAVIS v. BROWN, SECY. OF STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 23, 1954

Citations

161 Ohio St. 346 (Ohio 1954)
119 N.E.2d 277

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. v. Board

The rule of statutory construction that acts of the General Assembly are presumed valid and that all doubt…

State, ex Rel. Morgan, v. Arshinkoff

We conclude that the specific provisions of Section 13, Article IV control in the instant case. State, ex…