From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Feb 25, 1997
939 S.W.2d 532 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

No. 67299, 70157

OPINION FILED: February 25, 1997

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS HONORABLE ANNA C. FORDER

Deborah B. Wafer, District Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, David R. Truman, Jefferson City, for respondent.

BEFORE CRAHAN, P.J., GRIMM, J., AND HOFF, J.



ORDER


A jury convicted defendant of second degree murder, § 565.021.1, armed criminal action, § 571.015, and felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. It assessed punishment at thirty years for the murder, fifteen years for the armed criminal action, and one year for the stealing. The trial court imposed those sentences and directed they be served consecutively.

On appeal, defendant raises four points. One concerns a Batson issue. The other three relate to jury instructions.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

In addition, defendant appealed the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion. However, she did not raise any points on appeal concerning that denial. Her appeal is deemed abandoned.State v. Page, 895 S.W.2d 269, 270 (Mo.App.S.D. 1995).


Summaries of

State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Feb 25, 1997
939 S.W.2d 532 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

State v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CORLISS BROOKS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Feb 25, 1997

Citations

939 S.W.2d 532 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)