From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brock

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 23, 2021
Appellate Case No. 2019-001848 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-238 Appellate 2019-001848

06-23-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Courtney Elizabeth Brock, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2021

Appeal From Beaufort County Kristi F. Curtis, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brock

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 23, 2021
Appellate Case No. 2019-001848 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Courtney Elizabeth Brock, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2019-001848 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 23, 2021)