From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brisbon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 11, 2017
2017-UP-373 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2017)

Opinion

2017-UP-373

10-11-2017

The State, Respondent, v. Rashad Corneal Brisbon, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-001949

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2017

Appeal From Sumter County W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C. J, and HUFF and HILL, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brisbon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 11, 2017
2017-UP-373 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Brisbon

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Rashad Corneal Brisbon, Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 11, 2017

Citations

2017-UP-373 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2017)