State v. Boston

Full title: The STATE, Respondent, v. Darell Oneil BOSTON, Petitioner.

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Mar 1, 2023

439 S.C. 103 (S.C. 2023)

886 S.E.2d 208

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2021-000549 Opinion No. 28137

03-01-2023

The STATE, Respondent, v. Darell Oneil BOSTON, Petitioner.

David Nelson Lyon, of Duff, Freeman, Lyon, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

David Nelson Lyon, of Duff, Freeman, Lyon, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Boston , 433 S.C. 177, 857 S.E.2d 27 (Ct. App. 2021). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.¹

1 Counsel for Petitioner handled this appeal as part of the Appellate Practice Project. We applaud the professional ability of counsel and admire his willingness to volunteer his time and efforts in representing Petitioner.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.