From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Blunt

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
May 8, 2020
DOCKET NO. A-0917-17T4 (App. Div. May. 8, 2020)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-0917-17T4

05-08-2020

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CURTIS BLUNT, a/k/a CURTIS MCCLAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Daniel S. Rockoff, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief). Christopher L.C. Kuberiet, Acting Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Patrick F. Galdieri II, Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. Before Judges Messano, Ostrer and Susswein. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Accusation No. 14-11-0506 and Indictment No. 12-12-1859. Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Daniel S. Rockoff, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief). Christopher L.C. Kuberiet, Acting Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Patrick F. Galdieri II, Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief). PER CURIAM

Defendant, Curtis Blunt, appeals from the sentence imposed following his revocation of special Drug Court probation. Specifically, he contends the resentencing court should have awarded additional jail credits. We determined that the record before us was inadequate to permit meaningful appellate review of defendant's claim that he was entitled to additional jail credits. Accordingly, we temporarily remanded to the trial court to conduct further proceedings and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. We retained jurisdiction.

Sadly, we have since been advised by defense counsel that defendant is deceased. It is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

State v. Blunt

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
May 8, 2020
DOCKET NO. A-0917-17T4 (App. Div. May. 8, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Blunt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CURTIS BLUNT, a/k/a CURTIS…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2020

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-0917-17T4 (App. Div. May. 8, 2020)