Opinion
No. 21-KP-0413
05-11-2021
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. TIMOTHY R. BILLIOT
IN RE: Timothy R. Billiot - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Number(s) 17-201088, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2020 KW 1168; Writ application denied. See per curiam.
SJC
JLW
JDH
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 11, 2021 /s/_________
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. MARY PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.