From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bianchi

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 12, 1992
823 P.2d 1043 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

C89-05-32780; CA A65872

Argued and submitted December 20, 1991

Probation revocation affirmed; minimum term vacated and remanded for resentencing February 12, 1992

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Mercedes F. Deiz, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Attorney General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Probation revocation affirmed; minimum term vacated; remanded for resentencing.


In the probation revocation proceeding, we affirm the revocation. The state concedes that the minimum term imposed is invalid. We accept the concession, vacate the minimum term and remand for resentencing.

Probation revocation affirmed; minimum term vacated; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Bianchi

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 12, 1992
823 P.2d 1043 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Bianchi

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE BRUCE BIANCHI, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 12, 1992

Citations

823 P.2d 1043 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
823 P.2d 1043