Opinion
1 CA-CR 21-0345 PRPC
10-28-2021
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. EDWIN TAYLOR BERRY, Petitioner.
Yavapai County Attorney's Office, Prescott By Joshua I. Fisher Counsel for Respondent Edwin Taylor Berry, Florence Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County No. P1300CR201500825 The Honorable Krista M. Carman, Judge
Yavapai County Attorney's Office, Prescott
By Joshua I. Fisher
Counsel for Respondent
Edwin Taylor Berry, Florence
Petitioner
Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge David B. Gass, and Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION 1
PER CURIAM
¶1 Petitioner Edwin Taylor Berry seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner's latest successive petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the state's response, the petitioner's reply and the petition for review. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies relief. 2