In Befort and Fritzemeier, each defendant's blood was taken without his consent and only for the purpose of testing it for alcohol levels.
Summary of this case from State v. StuartNo. 91,565.
January 14, 2005.
Appeal from the Ellis.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In Befort and Fritzemeier, each defendant's blood was taken without his consent and only for the purpose of testing it for alcohol levels.
Summary of this case from State v. StuartFull title:STATE v. BEFORT
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jan 14, 2005
By eliminating the physician-patient privilege in DUI cases, the legislature has indicated its intention to…
State v. Stuart43 Kan.App.2d 403, Syl. Stuart cites to two unpublished opinions, State v. Fritzemeier, 2007 WL 2080481…