Opinion
NO. 2011-K-1185
02-15-2012
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KENNETH BARNES
PATRICK CANTON McGINITY DONALD ANTHONY SAUVIAC, JR. COUNSEL FOR RELATOR, KENNETH BARNES LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FELICITY STRACHAN, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT, STATE OF LOUISIANA
ON APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO
CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH
NO. 488-187, SECTION "B"
HONORABLE LYNDA VAN DAVIS, JUDGE
JUDGE MICHAEL E. KIRBY
(Court composed of Judge Michael E. Kirby, Judge Max N. Tobias, Jr., Judge Paul A. Bonin)
PATRICK CANTON McGINITY
DONALD ANTHONY SAUVIAC, JR.
COUNSEL FOR RELATOR, KENNETH BARNES
LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY
FELICITY STRACHAN, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT, STATE OF LOUISIANA
WRIT GRANTED; JUDGMENT REVERSED.
The defendant, Kenneth Barnes, seeks this Court's review of the trial court's denial of his motion for continuance of trial scheduled for September 1, 2011. The State of Louisiana joined in the defendant's motion, and has filed its own writ application seeking review of the trial court's denial of the motion in 2011-K-1186.
This Court has previously found, in unpublished writ dispositions, that it is an abuse of the trial court's discretion to deny a motion for continuance when both sides in a criminal case agree to a continuance of trial. La. C.Cr.P. art. 707; State v. Lee, 11-1176, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/25/11); State v. Richardson, 09-0953, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/20/09); State v. King, 11-0243, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/18/11); State v. Terry, 11-0245, unpub. (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/18/11). In the instant case, the trial court, on August 26, 2011, denied the joint motion for continuance of the trial scheduled for September 1, 2011. We find that this was an abuse of the trial court's discretion. Accordingly, we grant the defendant's writ application and reverse the trial court judgment denying the continuance. We hereby grant the continuance of the September 1, 2011 trial date. Because of our decision, the request for a stay is moot.
WRIT GRANTED; JUDGMENT REVERSED