From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Baldwin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 23, 1970
478 P.2d 437 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. C-52724

Argued December 10, 1970

Affirmed December 23, 1970

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Multnomah County, ROBERT E. JONES, Judge.

Richard A. Reichsfeld and Gregory Reichsfeld, Portland, for appellant.

Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and FOLEY and FORT, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


Defendant, appearing with counsel, pleaded guilty to obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of ORS 165.205. She was given the maximum sentence.

On appeal she contends (1) that she was not fully advised of her rights, and (2) that the sentence was excessive.

Her first assignment of error presents no issue for review. ORS 138.050; State v. Brudos, 3 Or. App. 239, 471 P.2d 861, Sup Ct review denied (1970).

Her second assignment of error has no merit. State v. Fraley, 2 Or. App. 238, 467 P.2d 683 (1970).

While it is not determinative of the issue, we note from the record that defendant is not a first offender.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Baldwin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 23, 1970
478 P.2d 437 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

State v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DRUCILLA RAYE BALDWIN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 23, 1970

Citations

478 P.2d 437 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
478 P.2d 437