From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bagley

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 1, 2008
256 S.W.3d 219 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. WD68399.

July 1, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer County, Jack N. Peace, Judge.

Kenneth C. Hensley, Raymore, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Shaun Mackelprang and Cory Lee Atkins, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.


ORDER


Clinton Bagley appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for driving while intoxicated. Bagley complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial. We find no abuse of discretion. As a formal published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Bagley

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 1, 2008
256 S.W.3d 219 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Bagley

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clinton BAGLEY, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jul 1, 2008

Citations

256 S.W.3d 219 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)