From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Austin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 4, 1990
789 P.2d 18 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

P000566; CA A60583

Argued and submitted October 27, 1989

Affirmed April 4, 1990

Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Thomas L. Moultrie, Judge.

Glenn N. Solomon, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred by admitting certain documents; he contends that they are hearsay.

The evidence of defendant's guilt was overwhelming and any error in admitting the documents was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Austin

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 4, 1990
789 P.2d 18 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID AUSTIN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 4, 1990

Citations

789 P.2d 18 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
789 P.2d 18