State v. Arthur

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. James Lamont Arthur, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 13, 2019

Appellate Case No. 2017-002595 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-002595 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-364

11-13-2019

The State, Respondent, v. James Lamont Arthur, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and James Lamont Arthur, pro se. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and James Lamont Arthur, pro se. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.