From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Antee

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 27, 1933
176 La. 847 (La. 1933)

Opinion

No. 32226.

February 27, 1933.

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Grant; Wiley R. Jones, Judge.

C.H. McCain, of Colfax, for appellant.

G.L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O'Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry Fuller, Dist. Atty., to Winnfield (James O'Niell, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.


The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for violation of the prohibition law, known as the Hood Act, being Act No. 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.), as amended by Act No. 57 of 1924. After conviction but before sentence he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, contending that the Hood Act was repealed by Act No. 238 of 1932. The district attorney then pleaded that the act of 1932 was unconstitutional. The district judge held that the act of 1932 was unconstitutional, and he therefore overruled the motion in arrest of judgment.

We decided to-day in State v. Herbert Watkins, 176 La. 837, 147 So. 8, that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional and that the Hood Act was therefore yet in effect.

For the reasons given in that case, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

ST. PAUL, J., absent because of illness.


Summaries of

State v. Antee

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 27, 1933
176 La. 847 (La. 1933)
Case details for

State v. Antee

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DUKE ANTEE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 27, 1933

Citations

176 La. 847 (La. 1933)
147 So. 11

Citing Cases

State v. Washburn

In State v. Watkins, 176 La. 837, 147 So. 8, this court held that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional,…

City of Alexandria v. Alexandria Fire Fight. Ass'n

See Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, 8th Ed. Vol. 1, page 245. And, although it appears in the…