From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 11, 1979
376 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1979)

Opinion

No. 56118.

October 11, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Wilkey D. Ferguson, Jr., J.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Janet Reno, State's Atty. and Howard K. Blumberg and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. State Attys., Miami, for petitioner.

William R. Tunkey and Alan S. Ross of Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey Ross, and Joel D. Robrish of Robrish, Major Logan, Miami, for respondents.


This case involves an interpretation of our speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. For the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kehoe, we reverse the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal, as reported at 369 So.2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and hold that rule 3.191 requires that a defendant be taken into state custody in order to start the speedy trial times expressed in the rule.

ENGLAND, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 11, 1979
376 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1979)
Case details for

State v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. HENRY ANDREWS AND ROBERT LEE RICHBURG…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 11, 1979

Citations

376 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1979)

Citing Cases

Bannister v. State

Therefore the appellant was taken into state custody commencing the speedy trial time in September, rather…

State v. Lail

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 provides that a defendant must be taken into state custody to…