From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Amado

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 1999
723 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Decided January 4, 1999


The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 607 (AC 15176), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), on the trial court's instructions regarding General Statutes § 53a-20, concerning the use of force in defense of premises?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), on the trial court's instructions regarding the duty to retreat?

"3. If the answer to question one or two is no, was either such improper instruction harmless in view of the affirmance of the defendant's convictions of two counts of felony murder?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16058.

Susann E. Gill, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Lauren Weisfeld, assistant public defender, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Amado

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 4, 1999
723 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Amado

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ERIC AMADO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 4, 1999

Citations

723 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1999)
723 A.2d 811

Citing Cases

State v. Burke

(Citations omitted.) State v. Amado, 42 Conn. App. 348, 357-58, 680 A.2d 974 (1996), remanded for…

State v. Amado

" and (3) "If the answer to question one or two is yes, was either such improper instruction harmless in view…