Opinion
NO. 2016 KW 1421
10-25-2016
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DAVID ADAMS
In Re: David Adams, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 32,145. BEFORE: PETTIGREW, McDONALD AND DRAKE, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-5(C)(6), (7), (8), (9) and (10), by failing to include a copy of the judgment, order, or ruling complained of, a copy of the judge's reasons for judgment (if any), a copy of the pleadings on which the ruling was founded (including a copy of the bill of information and the motion in limine), a copy of the opposition to the motion (or a statement that no opposing written document was filed), and a copy of the pertinent court minutes. Relator also failed to comply with Rules 4-3 and 4-5(C)(11), by failing to include documentation of a timely request for a return date and the return date order. Relator also failed to comply with Rule 4-5(A), by failing to include in the declaration the telephone numbers of the judge and opposing counsel. Moreover, although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, we note that relator failed to include a copy of a transcript of the proceedings at issue. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983).
JTP
JMM
EGD
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT