From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Acosta

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 30, 2020
954 N.W.2d 776 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

In Acosta, Snapchat messages were identified through the username of the person sending them, screenshots, as well as the timing and context of the messages.

Summary of this case from State v. Brown

Opinion

No. 19-0364

11-30-2020

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darlin Lenin Veliz ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

Elena M. Greenberg of Greenberg Law, Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Acosta

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Nov 30, 2020
954 N.W.2d 776 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

In Acosta, Snapchat messages were identified through the username of the person sending them, screenshots, as well as the timing and context of the messages.

Summary of this case from State v. Brown
Case details for

State v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARLIN LENIN VELIZ ACOSTA…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

954 N.W.2d 776 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

State v. Brown

"Evidence that an electronic writing is what the proponent claims it is requires 'evidence sufficient to show…